NewsColony
Image default
News

China under-reported coronavirus cases by half, leaked documents reveal

China under-reported its coronavirus cases and deaths by up to half during the early stages of the pandemic, leaked documents have revealed.

Beijing has long been accused of under-reporting its coronavirus numbers, but the data gives an idea of the scale of the problem for the first time. 

For example, on February 10 China reported 2,478 new cases of the virus across the entire country – but leaked data shows that, on the same date, Hubei province alone logged 5,918 cases.

Meanwhile on March 7, Hubei was officially reporting a cumulative death toll of 2,986, but documents show it actually stood at 3,456.

The official figures, which were reported across the world, downplayed the severity of the outbreak at a time when world leaders were trying to devise their own response strategies – leaving many unprepared for what was to come.

China under-reported its coronavirus cases and deaths during the early stages of the pandemic, with leaked documents giving a glimpse of the scale for the first time (file image)

China under-reported its coronavirus cases and deaths during the early stages of the pandemic, with leaked documents giving a glimpse of the scale for the first time (file image)

China under-reported its coronavirus cases and deaths during the early stages of the pandemic, with leaked documents giving a glimpse of the scale for the first time (file image)

Other examples include March 7, when Hubei officially reported 83 cases but in fact the total was 115. 

Data also suggests that the number of cases recorded in 2019, when the virus first emerged, was 200.

Until now, China has only publicly acknowledged 44 cases in 2019 – which it reported to the WHO as ‘a pneumonia of unknown etiology’ on January 3.

The documents, comprising 117 pages, were handed to CNN by a whistleblower inside the Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, which was at the epicentre of the outbreak.

The whistleblower described themselves as ‘a patriot’ who was ‘motivated to expose a truth that had been censored, and honor colleagues who had also spoken out.’

Alongside the true case and death tolls, the documents reveal for the first time that Hubei was in the midst of a major flu epidemic at the time coronavirus struck.

The province was reporting up to 20 times the normal number of seasonal flu cases in December 2019, centered in the cities of Yichang and Xianning.

Wuhan, where coronavirus would first emerge, was third worst-affected.

While there is no suggestion that the outbreaks are linked, the flu epidemic likely left health officials stretched and unprepared for the emergence of a new illness.

The documents also reveal a shambles among China’s early testing regime, which contributed to the cases being under-reported.

According to the data, nucleic acid tests which were initially used to diagnose the virus only worked between 30 per cent and 50 per cent of the time.

That meant scientists were often forced to use other methods – such as scans of the lungs – to diagnose patients they were sure had the virus, but whose tests kept coming back negative.

But because of the way China’s reporting system worked, only those cases which had been confirmed by the test were publicly reported.

All other cases were marked down as ‘suspected’ or ‘clinically diagnosed’.

Chinese scientists examining the genetic code of coronavirus claim to have food evidence that suggests the virus did not originate in their country (file image, a Covid patient in Wuhan)

Chinese scientists examining the genetic code of coronavirus claim to have food evidence that suggests the virus did not originate in their country (file image, a Covid patient in Wuhan)

Chinese scientists examining the genetic code of coronavirus claim to have food evidence that suggests the virus did not originate in their country (file image, a Covid patient in Wuhan)

While bureaucrats would have been aware of both figures, and may have been aware of the problems with testing, they chose only to report cases with a positive test – at least initially.

China did start adding ‘clinically diagnosed’ cases to its totals in mid-February, but by then the virus had already spread far beyond its own borders. 

Yanzhong Huang, a fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations who specilaises in Chinese public health, told CNN: ‘It was clear they did make mistakes.

‘Not just mistakes that happen when you’re dealing with a novel virus, also bureaucratic and politically-motivated errors in how they handled it. 

‘These had global consequences.’

While Huang does not believe correct reporting would have stopped the pandemic, it undoubtedly gave off the false impression that China’s outbreak was less severe than it truly was. 

The early testing regime also suffered huge delays, with the average time taken from the onset of disease to diagnosis being 23 days.

That meant China’s official daily totals were lagging three weeks behind reality, while at the same time hampering its own ability to respond to the crisis.

By March, testing had improved to the point where most cases were being  

Source: Daily Mail |World News

Related posts

Changes to citizenship rules to see would-be Australians take a test about mateship and a ‘fair go’

NewsColony

Teen defers university to voluntarily contract COVID-19

NewsColony

Man charged with threatening to kill Queensland CHO and premier

NewsColony

Leave a Comment